Blog.jpg

Wade Wade Wade Wade Wade Waaaaade

Posted by RodandDenise on February 27, 2012

2012_Feb_27_a_Exposed_Jarrah_wood_horn_cap_on_Wade_tree_1201004.jpg

Oh yeah, I did that already…  Today I was labelling pictures of the trees that we have shipped out over the last little while.  I take a series of shots of every tree, which proved really handy when it came to updating the website.  And I noticed something – there were a lot pictures of Wades in there.  Wonder why?  So I thought this would be a great time to show some comparison pictures of Wade forks.

2012_Feb_27_b_marking_out_Wade_fork.jpg

As I was going through them, I found we had quite the range of “widths” of Wades.  You remember, of course, that there is no place to measure a slick fork for “width”, and that every tree maker does things differently?  We do keep the width across the horizontal line that goes across the bottom of the hand hole consistent when we mark out our slick forks (see arrow on above picture), and we do vary this a consistent amount between equivalently different “widths".  But the numbers are just a way to label the forks, although I am sure I can make it measure that width somewhere if I just move the ruler around enough!

Fortuitously, these trees were all built with the same bar specs – 4 x 90.  This is helpful in comparing the look of the trees since bar spread and angle can affect the look at the bottom of the fork.  Wider spread and angle = wider spread across the bottom of the fork.  Differences in gullet height can also change the look a bit, and there is up to ¼” difference in gullet and hand hole height between these trees.  (Gullet height and hand hold height correlate with these trees since everything else that affects the relationship between gullet height and hand hole height is the same.)  But a ¼” gullet height doesn’t make a huge difference, so these are good comparison pictures.

2012_Feb_27_1_Wade_7.5_5_ST_1108083_back_4_x_90_7.385.jpg

The first one is less than an 8”, so we nominally call it a 7 ½” Wade.  When Rod was taught how to build trees, he was told “Figure out how slick you want to make your slickest fork and call it an 8”.”  But then we have had a very few customers – two in particular – that like a slicker look.  So we have made a few slicker than an 8”.  And one of those customers ordered in this group.

2012_Feb_27_2_Wade_8_5_ST_1201002_back_4_x_90_7.5.jpg

Then we have an 8” Wade.  I crunched some numbers to check and lately this has been our most common size to build.  However, this hasn’t always been the case.

2012_Feb_27_3_Wade_8.5_5_ST_1112127_back_4_x_90_7.5.jpg

We built three of the 8 ½” width in the last few weeks.  This isn’t a real common order, but we do make a fair number of this size.

2012_Feb_27_4_Wade_9_5_ST_1201007_back_4_x_90_7.5.jpg

The 9” width just beats out the 8” in total number built, but we did a lot more of those in the earlier years.  Like I said above, the 8” is the most common order over the last few years.

No 9 ½” wide Wades to show you.  That is our least common order, and we haven’t even built one every year.  Our last order for a 9 ½” was in August.

2012_Feb_27_5_Wade_10_5_ST_1201006_back_4_x_90_7.75.jpg

The 10” width is basically as wide as you can get before it becomes a swell fork.  It is not a common request, but we build a few every year.

So there you have it – a nice run down of different Wade fork widths. 

Comments:

Leave a Reply



(Your email will not be publicly displayed.)


Captcha Code

Click the image to see another captcha.


© 2014 Rod Nikkel Saddle Trees. All Rights Reserved.

Hosted by Tooq Inc.